The “transaction” is the lifeblood of any business, without which there are no revenues, without which there are no other ancillary business activities … no communications, no public relations, nada, zilch, zip. In case you may doubt this, remember that the fundamental absence of transaction is what stalled the Web 1.0 boom and, ultimately, burst the bubble.
Elementary, my dear Watson! Yes, but maybe its being so elementary to any market activity is precisely what makes the importance of the transaction so often overlooked by practitioners of certain ancillary business activities, say, journalism or public relations, for example.
So, I was heartened to see Joel Postman’s recent piece about his efforts to enlighten clients about the business value of social media, Get that social media guy outta here! (don’t get your hackles up … Joel is the ‘social media guy’ in this instance).
I linked to Joel’s post yesterday and commented that in all the online discussions of social media I’ve been reading, overlooked is the ultra-obvious point that Joel makes that clients first and foremost “want to achieve communications and business objectives” and are specifically interested in “driving more traffic to the web site and generating leads.” Those are “sales leads,” by the way, and their only purpose is to culminate in … yes, you guessed it, a transaction.
It’s my feeling that the professional identity that has been developed around journalism and, to a lesser extent, public relations, has led practitioners to think of what they do more as a vocation or calling, than a business activity. In journalism, this skewed view has meant that successive waves of practitioners have stood frozen like deer in the headlights of oncoming market forces that are driven by tighter margins and increased competition as a result of technology-enabled new and faster means of delivering information to consumers.
Somethin’s happenin’ here … the radio seemed to be playing, but to myself and many colleagues for many years, what it was wasn’t exactly clear. What it was is a basic truth that journalism within a market economy is a business activity, part of the news business, dependent for its survival on revenue-generating advertising and subscription transactions; a basic truth that was largely overlooked by the practitioners themselves in favor of the journalism-as-profession construct.
I think that practitioners of public relations, particularly those in agency management positions, are less likely to overlook the obvious business reality of PR. But the tendency to view PR as a collegial profession — with its professional societies, university curricula, codes, social and educational events — still clouds the understanding of the specific value to clients of what is inherently a business activity built around the fundamental need to drive the transaction.
Yes, we’re communicators; yes we’re public relations professionals; yes, we may believe in social media as the wave of the future. But, the real task at hand, in addition to showing our adherence to professionalism, is to demonstrate that with our skills and knowledge we can help clients to meet real business objectives and generate sales leads that will lead to revenue-generating … oh well, shall I say it one more time? … transactions.
Add to New PR
E-mail this
Save to del.icio.us
Digg This!













8 August, 2007 at 3:54 am
[...] Mindshare posts a thoughtful tract on the bottom line for PR [...]
8 August, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Thanks for pointing to my post and continuing this dirty little dialogue. It makes no sense to go down either purist route — “it’s all about the conversation” or “it’s all about the money” (with apologies to Grandmaster Flash.) Social Media DOES have tremendous value to clients, and they can participate and take advantage of its benefits in the framework of doing business responsibly and profitably.
8 August, 2007 at 6:27 pm
Good post – thanks. I would extend the concept further than just transactions though and say that PR, and social media, needs to focus on the key organisational objectives. Those may be about generating income, but could also be about attracting new talent, increasing shareprice, reducing costs, avoiding crisis, reducing staff turnover, ensuring legislation is not prohibitive, etc, etc.
I was once told that the job of PR is to address the organisational issues that keep the CEO awake at night – which I feel is a great perspective to have and one guaranteed to demonstrate the real value of PR.
8 August, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Thanks for the feedback! Of course, I was simplifying for the sake of argument (and wouldn’t really want to be considered a ‘vulgar reductionist’ on this one!). And, I fully agree that there are multiple business benefits.
But, after having seen many a good dot-com idea whither on the vine because, despite all the predictions, the buyers weren’t transacting with the sellers, I know that revenues have to come first in order to pay for the new talent recruitment, crisis management outreach, lobbying for fair legislation, etc. The job with client proposals is to convince them that PR outreach, social media and the like can help them generate those revenues, as well as do all the rest.