Is blogging dying? So, why worry about ‘blogger relations’?

Is blogging dying? Or just crowded out by all the newest Web 2.0 (aka “live web”) platforms out there? Here are a couple of recent posts I’ve seen while out and around the ’sphere that speak to those points:

Add to New PRadd to del.icio.us E-mail thisadd to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.usDigg it Digg This!

6 Responses to “Is blogging dying? So, why worry about ‘blogger relations’?”

  1. Matt’s Daily Diigo Post 07/19/2007 « Matt’s Cuppa Says:

    [...] one day mark the decline of the long form blog as we know and love it today.  BL Ochman and Michael Tangeman are two that are pondering the same trend. The demands on our time, be they work, family, shiny [...]

  2. Michael Sommermeyer Says:

    The various social media channels are consolidating into specialized and stacked boxes of content and groups. Take Ning for example: there social friends are forming into specific groups. Their attention is focused on building a targeted audience. Those individuals will cross over into other social boxes, and they will bring friends with them. Twitter allows bloggers to cross-post and promote their blog posts in small chunks, while Pownce expands messages into mini-blog entries, which also can point to full blogs.

    The adage that for every blog there is one reader - the blogger - may no longer be true as blogging communities allow voices to be heard and shared. The individual blog is morphing into a community model and more people will create, share and build messages that more people will hear.

  3. Ike Pigott Says:

    If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

    Blogs are being joined by other tools in the social media toolkit. Nothing more.

  4. Michael Tangeman Says:

    And, from Joel Postman via e-mail backchannel, there’s … “Not sure about the answer to that question. Everybody is Facebooking this month, but I think that’s because the interface is livelier than a blog and it’s easier to “connect” with people.”

    I like Michael’s metaphor of “stacked boxes,” as clearly that’s what I’m seeing. Distinct universes that intersect and overlap and clearly, some of the newer social media platforms are being used to point people back to individual blogs.

    And, thanks, Ike … but whenever the “hammer” is not the answer, and even before you’ve put together your entire social media toolkit, you’ve still got to know what the question is!

    Clearly, this is being defined on the fly. Why? Because form and function of social media are interactive — as fast as new technologies and platforms arise, new and sometimes unforeseen functions for their use are being evolved.

    The ‘toolkit’ being assembled is not a solution to a problem, or an answer to a question yet — because the communities that are being enabled don’t yet consciously know what the question is. They have not yet discovered what they are trying to do within their new connected media.

  5. Ike Pigott Says:

    …ergo, they fumble with the new toys available until they figure out a use or their uselessness.

    I’m speaking of individuals, and you’re looking at the aspect of community. I posit that communities are assembled around those people for whom the style appeals and the substance performs. I personally like Pownce, but it’s blocked by the firewall at work, so I have less incentive to turn that toy into a tool.

    Fundamentally, we agree - I was looking micro and you were looking macro. Nothing to see here, carry on…

  6. Get Me, I’m Givin’ Out Wings Says:

    [...] I have made some ‘connections’ through my blog, my comments, my del.icio.us links, Twitter, Facebook and recently Pownce.  But do I believe that because [...]

Leave a Reply